Sir Keir Starmer, the recently elected leader of Britain’s main opposition party, has changed Labour’s stance on the Kashmir issue.
“Britons of Indian origin contribute so much to the UK and to the Labour Party,” Starmer said on April 30 after a meeting with the executive team of Labour Friends of India.
“I’m committed to working closely with Labour Friends of India to rebuild trust with the community. We must not allow issues of the sub-continent to divide communities here.
“Any constitutional issues in India are a matter for the Indian Parliament, and Kashmir is a bilateral issue for India and Pakistan to resolve peacefully. Labour is an internationalist Party and stands for the defence of human rights everywhere.”
“A Labour Government under my leadership will be determined to build even stronger business links with India and to co-operate on the global stage on issues such as climate change,” Starmer added.
“I look forward to meeting the Indian High Commissioner in due course to open a renewed dialogue between the Labour Party and the people of India.”
Indians are the UK’s largest ethnic minority community, making up over 2.3% of the population, some 1.5 million people.
A large share of both British-Indians and British-Pakistanis vote for Labour.
Starmer’s comments are controversial for advocates of the Kashmiri cause, as they believe the region should have the right to self-determination via a referendum, rather than have their fate decided by others.
Labour Friends of India said that relations with Labour under previous leader Jeremy Corbyn were “strained” after party members passed a motion at their annual conference last September criticizing India’s actions towards Muslim-majority Kashmir.
Last Aug. 5, India stripped the region of its semi-autonomy and downgraded it into two federal territories.
The 2019 Labour motion said Kashmir was a “disputed territory and the people of Kashmir should be given the right of self-determination in accordance with UN resolutions.”
It said: “The enforced disappearance of civilians, the state endorsed sexual violence of women by armed forces and the overall prevalence of human rights violations in the region not only continues but has exasperated further in the past week.”
At the time, Labour Friends of India condemned what they saw as the “anti-Indian rhetoric contained in the emergency motion on Kashmir.”
Seema Chanwani, the vice-chair of London Labour, tweeted on April 30: “Keir Starmer cannot meet with an unaffiliated unaccountable group of people and change the Conference position on Kashmir unilaterally.”
In his maiden speech earlier this year, Labour MP Tahir Ali said: “This is not, in my view, a bilateral issue between India and Pakistan — the international community needs to take responsibility.”
“My role is not to take sides, such as to be pro-Pakistan or anti-India. I believe, as a Kashmiri, that it is my duty to highlight the abuses and human rights violations to this House,” he added.
“Even after seven decades, the people of the former princely state of Jammu and Kashmir are waiting for their right of self-determination, promised by the UN.”
The change in Labour’s position was welcomed by the Labour Friends of India, however.
“I congratulate Keir Starmer on his election as leader,” Rajesh Agrawal, the co-chair of Labour Friends of India, said after meeting with Starmer.
“I really welcome his commitment to rebuilding strong links between the Labour Party and the Indian community. This has been a great start and Keir has achieved a lot in the short span of a couple of weeks.
“Labour Friends of India will work closely with him and will continue to promote UK-India ties as well as continuing to raise any issues from the community to the leadership.”
Jammu and Kashmir is held by India and Pakistan in parts, and claimed by both in full. A small sliver is also held by China.
Since they were partitioned in 1947, the two countries have fought four wars – in 1948, 1965, 1971, and 1999 – three of them over Kashmir.
Some Kashmiri groups in Jammu and Kashmir have been fighting against Indian rule for independence, or unification with neighboring Pakistan.
According to several human rights groups, thousands of people have been killed in the conflict in the region since 1989.