The ongoing crisis in Lebanon is not economic as it seems but rather political from the outset, which hinders carrying out serious and swift reforms to ease woes of people, according to Lebanese political experts.
The economy has been devastated even after the incumbent Cabinet led by Prime Minister Hassan Diab was formed in late January following the departure of Saad Hariri government in October because of unprecedented anti-government protests over an economic crisis, that was described as the worst since the 1975-1990 civil war.
Despite the coronavirus pandemic, the Lebanese people continue taking to the streets amid reports of at least four people committing suicide in June due to the economic problems.
“There is an attempt to depict the problem as an economic issue, but it is political with distinction,” Makram Rabah, a history professor at the American University of Beirut, told Anadolu Agency.
Lebanon faces a challenge to restore “state’s sovereignty” in order to initiate a political and economic reform, Rabah argued, referring to the influence of political powers on the government and failure to get over the domestic rift caused by sectarianism that shaped the political scene for years.
Lebanon was devastated by a bloody 15-year-long civil war which began on April 13, 1975.
Under the 1989 Taif Accord, which ended the country’s civil war, cabinet portfolios are shared between the country’s main ethno-religious groupings, with six portfolios reserved for Sunnis, six for Shias and three for Druze.
Transitional, independent gov’t vital to overcome crisis
“The Lebanese citizens want quick solutions and this economic collapse leads to a state of loss and even potential famine and starvation,” Rabah stressed.
The purchase power of the Lebanese people has drastically dropped as 3,500 Lebanese liras are officially trading for $1, but it is about 9,000 Lebanese liras trading for $1 in the black market, after a sharp decline in the past weeks.
“The main problem was not Hariri’s departure but rather the ruling elites particularly, and the existing quota system,” the Lebanese academic said.
He opined that application of the quota system which is involved in administrative and political designations “affirms that the government is not independent even though it contains experts, this is not enough.”
According to Rabah, a transitional and independent government is vital to overcome the current crisis. And during the transitional state, disarming the influential group of Hezbollah would be beneficial since Lebanon is now distanced from the Arab World — which used to support it financially but not anymore.
“Lebanon is punished currently due to the policies of Gebran Bassil [former foreign minister] and Hezbollah,” he said, stressing that Lebanon needs to maintain good ties with Arab states and international community “except for Israel.”
However, “for the sake of objectivity, the main problem is not Hezbollah, but the concept that Hezbollah protects corruption.”
“Hezbollah was a catalyst that hastened the downfall,” he said, adding that such political classes use “Hezbollah’s weapons to protect their greed and gives Hezbollah a political cover which led the country to this tragic situation.”
‘Government of Hezbollah’
For his part, political analyst Moufid Mostafa touched on the lack of independence of the incumbent Lebanese government, calling it “the government of Hezbollah.”
“The most prominent challenge the government is facing today is that it is the government of Hezbollah and its allies, and therefore the Gulf states do not want to support them,” Mostafa told Anadolu Agency.
He pointed out that the government has failed in talks with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to take a loan, citing “their inability to meet the required reforms.”
Moreover, the coronavirus pandemic deepened to the economy crisis, said Mostafa, as the pandemic “greatly affected the money [transfer] of [the Lebanese] expatriates that was flowing from abroad which was a major supporter of the Lebanese economy.”
The political expert doubted that efforts by the government including subsidizing commodities and supporting the poor would resolve the crisis.
“All of these solutions are a local anesthetic; unless the crisis is resolved at its foundation, all these steps are temporary and useless,” he asserted, saying a political reform is key to the issue.
“It is very difficult to overcome the crisis in light of the current political components, even impossible,” Mostafa said.
According to the expert, forming a new government that could deal with IMF and other donor countries to obtain loans would be a short-term solution as swift solutions are urgent for the Lebanese citizens, including support for the electricity sector “which constitutes the largest deficit in the government budget.”
On the other hand, “the second long-term solution is to establish a new Lebanese system that establishes a civil state far from sectarian and political quotas,” Mostafa added.
Copyright 2021 Anadolu Agency. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.