WASHINGTON, Aug 16 (AFP) - US Democrats on Monday blasted President George W. Bush`s plan to bring home up to 70,000 troops from Europe and Asia, calling it dangerous, ill-conceived and a ploy to boost his bid for re-election.
Bush`s announcement quickly drew scathing criticism from former NATO commander Wesley Clark and ex-ambassador Richard Holbrooke, two senior advisers of Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry.
Clark said the 10-year plan, unveiled by the Republican Bush in a campaign speech to US veterans in Ohio, would "significantly undermine US national security."
"As we face a global war on terror with Al-Qaeda active in more than 60 countries, now is not the time to pull back our forces, and I question why President Bush would want to do this now," Clark said in a statement.
"This ill-conceived move and its timing seem politically motivated rather than designed to strengthen our national security," said the retired general who commanded NATO and US forces in Europe from 1997 to 2000.
He said removing US forces from the Korean peninsula could "send a dangerous signal of weak US resolve" to North Korea`s Kim Jong-Il at a crucial moment in efforts to persuade him to scrap his nuclear weapons programs.
A pullout from Europe, he said, would further strain relations with NATO allies, "be interpreted as the distancing of the US from NATO, and will set back US efforts to encourage greater NATO participation in Iraq."
Clark disputed Bush`s argument that US troops could be more quickly deployed to hotspots from the continental United States, and said the plan would do nothing to ease the burden on overstretched American forces.
"Worse, it will increase the burden on many military families as troops will be separated from their families during more frequent and unaccompanied deployments to Eastern Europe," he said.
Holbrooke, a former ambassador to Germany as well as assistant secretary of state for Asia, said Bush`s plan to redeploy troops and make them into a more mobile force to fight terrorism and other threats was "pretty alarming."
"There is no question in my mind that this will weaken our national security," said Holbrooke, who has been tipped as a potential secretary of state if Kerry wins the White House in the November 2 election.
"This is another example of the administration`s unilateralism. ... It is not going to save us money. It will cost billions of dollars to bring these troops home," he said in an interview with CNN.
Holbrooke said both the Germans and South Koreans would be very unhappy with Bush`s announcement that a total of 60,000 to 70,000 US troops would be repatriated.
"How can we withdraw troops from Korea while engaged in a delicate negotiation with the North Koreans?" he asked. "There`s a country that really does have weapons of mass destruction."
"Germany, South Korea and Japan, which will see the biggest cuts, all spend billions of dollars to support the troops. And I am very concerned about this."
Holbrooke also rejected the president`s assertion that bringing the troops home will make it easier to dispatch them to trouble spots. He called bases in Germany, South Korea and Okinawa "essential" along with other forward deployments.
"Even in the modern world, airplanes take time to get places," Holbrooke said. "This is a weakening of our traditional ties to our closest allies just when we need them most."
The exchange over the issue of troop deployments came as Bush pressed his attacks on Kerry`s security stance, slamming the Democrat`s pledge to bring back a sizable number of troops from Iraq within six months of taking office.
"I think that sends the wrong signal," Bush said, adding that it could encourage Iraqi insurgents to hold on, discourage US troops from completing their mission and leave allies wondering whether the United States means what it says.
Bush also ridiculed Kerry`s protest vote against a bill authorizing 87 billion dollars for postwar operations in Afghanistan and Iraq. "There`s nothing complicated about supporting our troops in combat," the president said.
The Kerry campaign responded with a statement accusing Bush of continuing "his pattern of misleading rhetoric ... and failing to articulate a plan for winning the peace in Iraq."
"George Bush is too busy attacking to get his facts straight and he is out of credibility," said Kerry spokesman Phil Singer.