By KORKUT GOZE (Hurriyet)
Columnist Korkut Goze evaluates last week’s super league. A summary of his article is as follows:
I love this league… Disputes, critiques, and quarrels even, I’m not willing to say, make me tipsy. Do not tell lies, the ones, who get angry, like this league.
Referees?
They are on the agenda of this week once… How could Zago punish with his behavior to Serdar Samatli in the Besiktas-Diyarbakir match?
According to somebody it was penalty. According to other ones play, continue.
What was Erman Guracar’s behavior to Tuncay in the Bursa-Fenerbahce match?
According to somebody it was penalty. According to other ones play, continue.
Two events resembling each other and disputes full of contradictions. And referees drowning among contradictions.
And referees who were bombarded according to critiques, information…
Selcuk Dereli, Bulent Demirlek, Serdar Tatli and Metin Tokat.
***
And I’m passing to Besiktas-Diyarbakir match. Before starting to speak Besiktas, I want to send a message to Diyarbakir…
Congratulations.
Your play, heart and determination were perfect.
Absents were Saffet ve Murat Hacioglu only. If these two men played, the score might change.
Besiktas?
I’m among the ones criticizing the play of the leader. May be among the ones taking lead. However I looked to the point table, difference in point increased to 5 points between Fenerbahce and Galatasaray in the 9th week.
This difference in points controls Besiktas up to its Galatasaray and Fenerbahce derbies.
The rest is related to the performance of Besiktas. Just if the away match of Gaziantep is overcame…
***
Bursa and Fenerbahce played the match of the week. Two men ascended onto the match than the result of 2-2.
One is Hooijdonk, other Daum.
The Dutch was the football player of the week; German was criticized technical man.
Hooijdonk was praised with his goals, which were obtained 7 points to Fenerbahce alone until now.
Daum was criticized because of his false team plan.
What was the meaning of Kemal and Yusuf’s waiting in the cabin for 62 minutes?
Why did not you benefit from Aurelio in such a this match?
And critiques were doted with a common opinion…
Fenerbahce was in the field with an opinion and team plan, which was not suited to Daum.
Despite all the things, there was the other part of the medallion.
Fenerbahce was giving point in an away match in this season.
And Daum was not saving himself from critiques even away matches, which he won.
The only difference is that the dosage of the critiques was not cruel like that…
***
The value of the three points that were received in the away match of Trabzonspor with Denizlispor was explained with a word.
“Gold”
And the eleven, which was on the field by Samet Aybaba, on the head of Trabzonspor that won three points, was interpreted as a critique word…
“Gamble”
Possible. May be Aybaba gambled… But, good players generally win gamble.
How about it?